TCG LIFESCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-11(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(A) had taken cognizance of the Tribunal's earlier order quashing the Section 263 order and dismissed the appeal before him. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) under Section 147/143(3) for AY 2009-10. The assessee's counsel pointed out that a previous order under Section 263 had been quashed by the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee had become infructuous due to the quashing of a prior Section 263 order by the Tribunal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D”, KOLKATA
ORDER
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 14.12.2017 passed by CIT(A)-4, Kolkata u/s 147/143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) for AY 2009-10.
Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. it is brought to our notice by the Ld.AR that the order passed u/s 263 was quashed by this Tribunal vide its order dated 07.07.2017. Ld.AR placed on record the said order and referring to para 8.14 submitted that since the order passed u/s 263 is quashed, the present appeal filed questioning giving effect order passed by the AO and the appeal becomes infructuous and no orders are required. On perusal of the impugned order, it is noted that the CIT(A) taken cognizance of order passed by this Tribunal in and dismissed the appeal filed before him. We find no infirmity in the order of CIT(A) and accordingly, Ground No.1 raised by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous.
Order pronounced in the open court on 13.02.2019.
Sd/- Sd/- (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY) (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER [ Date:- 13.02.2019 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to:
1. 1. Appellant- TCG Lifesciences Pvt.Ltd., Block BN, Plot no.7, Salt Lake Electronics Complex, Sector-V, Kolkata-700091.
2. Respondent- DCIT, Circle-11(2), Aayakar Bhawan, P-7, Chowringhee Square, Kolkata-700069.
3. CIT-Kolkata 4. CIT(Appeals)-Kolkata 5. DR: ITAT -Kolkata Benches By order
AR/H.O.O ITAT, KOLKATA
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026