NATURE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT, KOL - 4, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee's appeal challenging the CIT's Section 263 order had become infructuous. The Revenue did not dispute these developments.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT's order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer's consequential assessment order did not make any disallowance or addition as per the revision directions.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against a Section 263 order is rendered infructuous if the consequential assessment leads to no adverse findings for the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “C” KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:- This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Kolkata’s order dated 15.03.2018 passed in No.PCIT-4/Kol/C-11(1)/Kol/263/2017-18/10965, involving proceedings u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’.
Learned counsel representing assessee submit at the outset that its instant appeal challenging correction of CIT’s sec. 263’s order has been rendered infructuous since the Assessing Officer’s consequential assessment has not made any disallowance / addition as per revision directions. He places Nature & Waste Management India P Ltd. Vs. CIT-Kol-4 Page 2 on record the consequential assessment order dated 26.12.2018 to this effect. The Revenue is fair enough in not disputing all these intervening developments.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026