Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: These two appeals at the instance of assessee arise out of the orders dated 06.02.2015 and 21.01.2015 of ld. CIT(A) for the assessment years 2007- 08 and 2010-11 respectively.
None is present on behalf of the assessee despite the notice sent to the assessee at the given address. The notice so issued is deemed to be served upon the assessee. However, there is no representation on behalf of the assessee nor is there any written request for adjournment on record. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeals.
2 1880 & 1881/Del./2015 Therefore, the appeals of the assessee deserve to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, both the appeals are dismissed, as indicated above.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 08.11.2017.