Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “B” : DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI L.P. SAHU
This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar, dated 01st August, 2014 for the A.Y. 2010- 2011.
The assessee has been notified the date of hearing of the appeal twice through registered post. However, none appeared on behalf of the assessee at any time. It, therefore, appears that assessee is no more
2 ITA.No.6479/Del/2014 Cane Development Council, Shamili interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal of assessee is liable to be dismissed as un-admitted.
In view of the above and having regard to Rule 19(2) of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.); Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), and also the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) wherein their Lordships held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the same, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as un- admitted.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Sd/- Sd/- (L.P. SAHU) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi, Dated 21st November, 2017 VBP/-
3 ITA.No.6479/Del/2014 Cane Development Council, Shamili Copy to