M/S. BHATTER METALS PVT. LTD.,MEERUT vs. ITO, MEWAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 471/DEL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 November 2017AY 2010-113 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee appeared to be no longer interested in pursuing the appeal. Following established precedents, the appeal was dismissed as unadmitted.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2010-2011. Despite proper notification, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee for the hearing.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal can be dismissed for non-prosecution by the assessee. The importance of effectively pursuing an appeal beyond mere filing.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “B” : DELHI

Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI L.P. SAHU

Hearing: 23.11.2017Pronounced: 23.11.2017

order of the Ld. CIT(A), Meerut, dated 23rd November, 2015, for the A.Y. 2010-2011.

2.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite notifying the date of hearing through registered post. It, therefore, appears that assessee is no more interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee is liable to be dismissed.

2 ITA.No.471/Del./2016 M/s. Bhatter Metals Pvt. Ltd., Meerut. 3. In view of the above and having regard to Rule 19(2) of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.); Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court decision in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), and also the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) wherein their Lordships held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the same, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as un- admitted.

4.

In the result, appeal of assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open Court.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →