SOMEN BHATTACHARJEE,KOLKATA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TINSUKIA ASSAM

PDF
ITA 181/GTY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati27 August 2025AY 2018-2019Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member), SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS (Judicial Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘GUWAHATI’ BENCH, GUWAHATI’

For Appellant: Shri Prasanjit Das, AR
For Respondent: Shri Kausik Ray, DR
Hearing: 21.07.2025Pronounced: 27.08.2025

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘GUWAHATI’ BENCH, GUWAHATI’ BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM AND SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS, JM

ITA No. 181/GTY/2024 (Assessment Year:2018-19) Income Tax Officer, Somen Bhattacharjee Ward-1, Tinsukia Assam B/3/11 Northen Park Bansdroni, Sector-3, Tinsukia, Assam Vs. Kolkata-700070, West Bengal PIN-786125 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No. ACAPB0292M Assessee by : Shri Prasanjit Das, AR Revenue by : Shri Kausik Ray, DR Date of hearing: 21.07.2025 Date of pronouncement: 27.08.2025

O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 22.05.2024 for the A.Y. 2018-19.

2.

At the outset, we note that there is a delay of 60 days in filing the appeal by the assessee which were stated to be on account of non- receipt of the appellate order by the assessee. We find that the time taken in filing the appeal including the period of delay was stated to be on account of time taken in obtaining legal opinion as also the difficult terrain of Guwahati where travelling is hazardous and difficult. Considering the same, we find that the delay is for Bonafide and genuine reasons and therefore, we condone the same.

4.

In the appellate proceedings, the ld. CIT (A) upheld the order of the ld. AO.

5.

After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that in this case the assessee has purchased the property in Kolkata (flat) for ₹69.00 lacs whereas, stamp value as per stamp valuation was ₹1,00,80,000/- and hence,

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 27.08.2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (MANOMOHAN DAS) (RAJESH KUMAR) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Kolkata, Dated: 27.08.2025 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT DR, ITAT, 4. 5. Guard file. BY ORDER, True Copy//

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Guwahati

SOMEN BHATTACHARJEE,KOLKATA vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TINSUKIA ASSAM | BharatTax