Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: The assessee is in these appeals before the Tribunal against the separate orders of learned CIT(A)-XII, New Delhi dated 24.06.2014 passed for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10.
None is present on behalf of the assessee despite the notice for hearing was sent through registered post at the address given in the appeal papers. No written request for adjournment on behalf of the assessee is available on record. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeals. Therefore, the appeals of the assessee deserves to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, both the appeals are dismissed, as indicated above.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 28.11.2017.