M/S. DIVINE EXPORTS,MUMBAI vs. ITO, HARIDWAR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was filed beyond the period of limitation and the assessee had not provided any explanation for the delay. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) 14 days beyond the prescribed limitation period. Despite a defect memo and an adjournment, the assessee failed to provide any explanation or application for condonation of delay.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal filed by the assessee was within the prescribed limitation period and if there was a valid reason for the delay.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES “B”: DELHI
Before: SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
ORDER PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.
This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-1, Dehradun, dated 11th September, 2014, for the A.Y. 2007-2008.
According to Column No.9 of Form No.36, 16th October, 2014 has been mentioned as date of communication of the order appealed against. However, the assessee filed the appeal before the 2 ITA.No.7021/Del./2014 M/s. Divine Exports, Haridwar. Tribunal on 29th December, 2014. Thus, the appeal of assessee was time barred by 14 days. The Office issued defect memo to the assessee intimating the same to rectify the defect in the appeal.
However, the assessee did not take any steps. On the last date of hearing i.e., on 23.11.2017, the appeal was adjourned on the request of the assessee. The assessee was directed to take steps for explaining the delay in filing the appeal beyond the period of limitation. The appeal was adjourned to 30.11.2017. However, none appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing of the appeal. The assessee did not file any application for condonation of delay. It, therefore, appears that assessee has no explanation whatsoever to explain the delay in filing the appeal. The appeal is filed beyond the period of limitation. The appeal of the assessee is therefore, dismissed being time barred.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open Court.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (BHAVNESH SAINI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Delhi, Dated 30th November, 2017 VBP/-
3 ITA.No.7021/Del./2014 M/s. Divine Exports, Haridwar.
Copy to
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Dirtboot Holidays vs. The Commisssioner Central Goods And Service Tax, New Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- Mrs. Aqsa Begum vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026