DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. SVP BUILDERS (INDIA) LTD., GHAZIABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the additions on which the penalties were imposed had been deleted in the quantum appeals, the basis for the penalties collapsed. Therefore, the deletion of penalties by the CIT(A) was upheld.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of penalties imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for multiple assessment years. These penalties were based on additions made by the Assessing Officer.
What were the issues?
Whether penalties under Section 271(1)(c) can be sustained when the underlying additions have been deleted. The validity of penalty imposition in light of deletion of additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: All these six appeals are directed by the Revenue against separate orders of the ld. CIT(A)-X, Delhi, all dated 18.07.2014, challenging the deletion of penalties imposed by Assessing Officer u/s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1962, amounting to Rs.53,10,375/-, Rs.71,75,000/-, Rs.2,12,58,790/-, Rs.4,04,59,320/-, Rs.10,00,00,000/- and Rs.3,50,00,000/- respectively for the assessment years 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 and 2008-09 respectively.
ITA No. 5324 to 5329/Del./2014 2
The impugned orders have been challenged by the Revenue on the following solitary ground, which is common in all these appeals barring the amounts of penalties imposed. The ground raised in appeal for A.Y. 2003-04 reads as under :
“1. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred on facts and in law in cancelling the penalty of Rs.53,10,375/- imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s. 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961.”
We have heard both the parties and have gone through the entire material available on record. At the inception of hearing, the ld. AR of the assessee inviting our attention to a consolidated order dated 29th April, 2014 (copy placed on record) passed by ITAT Delhi Benches, New Delhi in quantum appeals of the assessee for the captioned assessment years, submitted that the additions, on the basis of which the impugned penalties have been imposed, stand deleted. He also invited our attention to the decision of Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court dated 15.12.2015(copy placed on record), whereby the appeals filed by the Revenue against the aforesaid order of the Tribunal stood dismissed. The learned Departmental representative fairly conceded that the additions giving rise to the present penalties stood deleted by the Tribunal order (supra) which stood confirmed by the Hon’ble High Court. In presence of all these facts, we are of the opinion, that once the additions, on ITA No. 5324 to 5329/Del./2014 3 the basis of which the impugned penalties have been imposed in the instant cases, have been deleted in quantum appeals, the very basis of imposition of penalties stood collapsed. We, therefore, are not inclined to interfere with the orders of the ld. CIT(A) who has deleted the impugned penalties after considering the order of the Tribunal, deleting the corresponding additions, as noted above. In view of this matter, the appeals of the Revenue are found bereft of merits and are, accordingly, liable to fail.
In the result, all these six appeals of the Revenue are dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30.11.2017.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026