M/S. UTTARAN,KOLKATA vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had a sufficient cause for non-appearance and restored the matter to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication. This was subject to the assessee paying costs of Rs. 1,000/- to the Prime Minister Relief Fund.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was against an order by the CIT(Exemption) dismissing its application for registration under Section 12AA for non-prosecution. The assessee claimed to have been prevented by sufficient cause from appearing before the CIT(Exemption).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee had a sufficient cause for non-appearance before the CIT(Exemption) for its registration application, and if so, whether the matter should be restored for fresh adjudication.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi
Date of concluding the hearing : February 27th , 2019 Date of pronouncing the order : March 20th ,2019 O R D E R Per J. Sudhakar Reddy :- This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 26.04.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata [‘CIT(Exemption)’].
None appeared on behalf of the assessee despite issual of notice. Earlier also there was no representation to the notice fixing the hearing on 04.02.2019. Under the circumstances, we dispose off this case ex parte qua the assessee on merit.
After hearing the ld. DR and perusing the impugned order passed by the CIT(Exemption), Kolkata, we find that the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AA of the Act was dismissed for non-prosecution. The assessee convinced us that it was prevented by sufficient cause from not appearing before the ld. CIT(Exemption). Under the circumstances, we deem it proper to restore the matter to the file of the CIT(Exemption), Kolkata for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, after giving the assessee sufficient opportunity of being heard in the interest of justice, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- in favour of Prime Minister Relief Fund. The ld. DR suggests that the assessee may file its application electronically and seek proper advice in this regard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Kolkata, the 20th March, 2019.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026