FUTURA POLYESTERS LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT - 5 (1)(2), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2725/MUM/2016Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 August 2018AY 2007-083 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal was defective due to the unexplained delay and the failure to cure the defect. Therefore, the appeal could not be admitted for hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal with a delay of seven days. Despite multiple hearing dates and a defect notice, the assessee failed to provide any explanation or application for condonation of the delay.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal filed with an unexplained delay can be admitted for hearing by the Tribunal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL

For Respondent: Shri Rajeev Gubgotra

This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 11/12/2015 of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax–10 (Mumbai) for the Assessment Year 2007–08. 2. Registry has pointed out a delay of seven days in filing the present appeal by the assessee. A defect notice in this regard was also issued by the Registry to the assessee on 02/11/2017. As could be seen from record, after issuance of the aforesaid notice by the Registry, the appeal was fixed for hearing on 13/02/2018, 21/03/2018, 12/04/2018, 31/05/2018, 27/06/2018, 18/07/2018 and finally on 08/08/2018. Till the appeal was heard on 08/08/2018, the assessee has not filed any application or affidavit explaining the cause of delay and seeking condonation thereof. In fact, on the aforesaid dates fixed for hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. Only on 19/03/2018, the assessee filed a cryptic two page written submission enclosing the annual report for the Financial Year 2006–07. Thus, till the date of hearing the assessee has failed to explain the delay of seven days in filing the aforesaid appeal. Therefore the defect pointed out by the Registry remains to be cured. Hence, the appeal has to be treated as defective appeal.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed in liminie on the ground of delay without being admitted.

4.

In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 23.08.2018

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →