F. HARLEY & CO. PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. CIT - 1, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had no grievance against the CIT(A)'s order as the AO's subsequent order did not result in any adverse findings. Therefore, the grounds raised by the assessee were rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(A) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) had directed the AO to pass a fresh assessment order. The AO subsequently passed a 'giving effect' order without making any additions or disallowances.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal is maintainable when the subsequent assessment order, passed in compliance with the CIT(A)'s directions, did not result in any adverse findings or additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D”, KOLKATA
ORDER PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER This appeal filed by the assessee against the order dated 29.03.2018 passed by CIT(A)-1, Kolkata for AY 2013-14 u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”).
Heard both parties and perused the material available on record. It is noted that the CIT(A) exercising the jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, directed the AO to pass a fresh assessment order considering the observations made by him vide his order. In pursuance of which the AO passed giving effect order dated 30.12.2018 wherein it was submitted by the Ld.AR that no disallowances were made by the AO. Further, he submits that since the assessee has no grievance against the order passed by the CIT(A) u/s 263 of the Act which is impugned before us as there was no adverse findings or additions by the AO in his giving effect order and submitted that no orders are required in this appeal. Therefore, taking
(ASSESSMENT YEAR-2013-14) into consideration the submissions of the Ld.AR & Ld.DR, the grounds raised by the assessee in this appeal are become infructuous requires no adjudication.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as infructuous. 3.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27.03.2019.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026