M/S. KANDA AGRICULTURE PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4258/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 December 2017AY 2007-084 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the non-compliance was due to reasonable cause, specifically the large volume of work and a director being in judicial custody. Therefore, the penalties were deleted.

What were the facts?

The assessee company was levied penalties under Section 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with statutory notices issued by the Assessing Officer. The CIT(A) upheld these penalties.

What were the issues?

Whether the non-compliance with statutory notices by the assessee constituted a reasonable cause for penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(b),Section 273B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : D : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI C.M. GARG

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain &, Shri Piyush Kamal, Advocates, Shri Amit Jain, Sr. DR
Hearing: 11.12.2017Pronounced: 11.12.2017

PER R.S. SYAL, VP:

1.

These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the confirmation of penalty amounting to Rs.20,000/- each under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’) in relation to the assessment years 2007-08 & 2008-09.

2.

Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the Assessing Officer imposed penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act for non- compliance of the statutory notices. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the penalty. Aggrieved, the assessee has filed the instant appeals.

3.

We have heard the parties and perused the relevant material on record. It was submitted by the ld. AR that the non-compliance of the statutory notices of hearing issued by the Assessing Officer was not intentional, but, was for reasonable cause as the assessee had to complete 303 group assessments within a short span of five months and further one of its directors was in judicial custody. We find that the non- compliance of the statutory notices by the assessee was due to the large volume of work to be completed by the assessee in a short span of time, which constitutes a reasonable cause within 2 the meaning of Section 273B of the Act. We, therefore, delete the penalties u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act. Our view is fortified by an order of the Tribunal dated 06.11.2017 in the case of another group concern of the assessee, namely, M.M. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT in to 4521/Del/2015, in which a similar penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(b) of the Act amounting to Rs.20,000/- each has been deleted. A copy of such order has been placed on record.

4.

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed.

Order Pronounced in the open Court on 11.12.2017.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)

All 2,912 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(b) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →