DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S USHA INTERNATIONAL LTD., NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to restrict the disallowance under Section 14A to the amount of exempt income, confirmed the deletion of club expenses as business expenditure, and allowed the deletion of disallowances for PF and ESI contributions paid before the return filing due date. The appeal regarding Section 80G deduction was also dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which partly allowed the assessee's appeal. The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading, had additions/disallowances made by the AO, which the CIT(A) partially reduced or deleted.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can exceed exempt income, whether club membership fees are business expenditure, and whether employee contributions to PF/ESI deposited late but before the return filing due date are disallowable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. AIMIL Ltd.1,629 citing321 ITR 508 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT803 citing372 ITR 694 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI H.S.SIDHU & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M. 1. This is an appeal filed by the Revenue against the order of the ld CIT(A)- 9, New Delhi dated 08.10.2015 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. 2. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the order passed by Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and the learned CIT(A) has erred in reducing the addition of Rs. 3,49,94,000/- to Rs. 5,93,000/- made by AO u/s 14A.
2. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the order passed by Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 5,60,082/- made by AO on account of Club expenses.
3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the order passed by Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the disallowance on account of PF of Rs. 1,56,178/- and ESI of Rs. 2,95,294/- totaling Rs. 4,51,472/-.
4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the order passed by Ld.CIT(A) is erroneous and the learned CIT(A) has erred in allowing deduction of Rs. 1,50,000/- u/s 80G of the I.T. Act.”
3. Brief facts of the case is that the assessee is engaged in manufacturing and trading of electric fans, water coolers and fuel injection equipments. Further, it is also marketing other consumer durables. It filed its return of income on 27.09.2011 for Rs. 498171009/-. The assessment u/s 143(3) was made on 28.03.2014 for Rs. 534774601/- making addition/ disallowance of Rs. 36603592/-. The assessee carried the matter before the ld CIT(A), who DCIT Vs. Usha International Ltd, (Assessment Year: 2011-12) allowed the appeal of the assessee partly. Therefore, on the relief given by the ld CIT(A), the revenue is contesting the present appeal. 4. The first ground of appeal is with respect to disallowance u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act made by the ld Assessing Officer of Rs. 34994000/- which was restricted to Rs. 593000/- by the ld CIT(A). During the year assessee has received dividend of Rs. 5.93 lacs which is exempt. The assessee has stated that it has not incurred any expenditure, however, the ld Assessing Officer applied Rule 8D and made a disallowance of Rs. 34996000/-. On appeal before the ld CIT(A), he restricted the same to Rs. 593000/-.
5. The ld DR relied upon the orders of the ld Assessing Officer, whereas, the ld AR relied upon the order of the ld CIT(A) and decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CIT 372 ITR 694.
6. We have carefully considered the rival contentions and also perused the orders the orders of the lower authorities. As the assessee has earned exempt income only Rs. 5.93 lacs disallowance u/s 14A cannot exceed the exempt income as held by Hon'ble Delhi High Court in Joint Investment Pvt. Ltd. (supra). Therefore, respectfully following the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court we confirm the finding of the ld CIT(A) and hence, ground No. 1 of the appeal of Revenue is dismissed.
7. Ground No. 2 of the appeal is with respect to the addition of Rs. 560082/- on account of club expenses deleted by the ld CIT(A). The assessee has claimed these expenses as it is paid to Panchsheel Club for renewal of corporate membership for 10 years. The ld AO disallowed the same. The ld CIT(A) allowed the claim of the assessee following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of United Glass Manufacturing Co. Ltd in Civil Appeal No. 6447/2012.
8. The ld DR relied upon the order of the ld Assessing Officer, whereas the ld AR relied on the decision cited above as well as submission before the ld CIT(A).
9. We have carefully considered the rival contentions. The above disallowance has been deleted by the ld CIT(A) relying upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court wherein, it is held that club membership fees incurred by the assessee is a business expenditure. We find no infirmity in the order of the ld CIT(A), hence, ground No. 2 of the appeal is dismissed.
10. Ground No. 3 of the appeal is with respect to disallowance deleted by the ld CIT(A) on account of provident fund of Rs. 156178/- and ESI of Rs. 295294/- which were paid before the due date of filing of return of income but disallowed by the ld Assessing Officer for the reason that it is employee’s contribution and deposited late. The ld CIT(A) deleted the
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026