NEWMAN STEEL PVT. LTD.,DARJEELING vs. ITO, WARD - 6(3), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 64/KOL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 April 2019AY 2008-093 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and, in the interest of justice, remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment. The assessee was permitted to file supporting evidence.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed ex parte without providing an opportunity for hearing. The assessee sought a remand to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration due to bonafide reasons for the delay in filing the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal ex parte without affording an opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Shri. S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM: This appeal by the assessee against the order dated 24.11.2016 1. passed by the CIT(A)-6, Kolkata for assessment year 2008-09. New Man Steel Pvt. Ltd. 1

2.

At the time of hearing, under the caption ‘Early Hearing’, it was brought to our notice by the ld. AR that the CIT(A) without giving any opportunity dismissed the appeal ex parte and prayed to remand the matter to the file of Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. Therefore, we proceed to hear the main appeal with the consent of both the parties.

3.

We find the reasons stated by the ld. AR are bonafide which really prevented the assessee in filing this appeal in time. Therefore, the delay of 34 days are condoned.

4.

Heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. It is observed from the impugned order in page 2 that the CIT(A) has given notice for hearing, but however no compliance was made by the assessee. We find the issue raised in this appeal is relating to confirmation of addition made by the Assessing Officer u/s 68 of the Act. As noted above we find no representation before the CIT(A)and no opportunity was available to the assessee in the assessment proceedings, therefore, in the interest of justice and facts and circumstances of the case we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer subject to a condition of payment of past of Rs. 5,000/- in favour of Prime Minister Relief Fund and the Assessing Officer has to satisfy the payment of such costs and proceed to complete the assessment. The assessee is liberty to file New Man Steel Pvt. Ltd. 2 evidences if any, in support of its claim. Thus, the main appeal in is disposed off as indicated above.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 03-04-2019.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →