BARING PRIVATE EQUITY PARTNERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 4(2), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal after the TPO accepted that the international transactions were at Arm's Length Price (ALP). Subsequently, the AO enhanced the income as 'NIL' under section 92CA(5), granting the assessee complete relief on the issues raised.
What were the facts?
Baring Private Equity Partners (India) Pvt. Ltd. appealed against a CIT(A) order related to an assessment under sections 143(3) and 144C for AY 2010-11. The appeal primarily challenged a transfer pricing adjustment concerning international transactions.
What were the issues?
Whether the international transactions undertaken by the assessee were at Arm's Length Price (ALP) and the validity of the transfer pricing adjustment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 92CA(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : I : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
(Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Ms Radhika Sharma, Advocate Revenue by : Shri Sandeep Kumar Mishra, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 17.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 17.10.2024 ORDER
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:
This appeal is preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 29.11.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-42 (hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in Appeal No.71/2015-16/CIT(A)-42 arising out of the appeal before it against the order dated 19.03.2014 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the DCIT, Circle 2 (1), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO).
At the time of hearing, it is seen that the assessee placed a letter dated 10.10.2024 on record requesting for withdrawal of the appeal since as per the directions of the CIT(A), the TPO passed an appeal effect order dated 06th December, 2022 wherein the Ld. TPO accepted that the international transaction undertaken by the assessee were conducted at the ALP and consequently, the AO was recommended to enhance the income of the assessee as ‘NIL’ under section 92CA(5) of the Act. The letter further states that the order giving effect to the finding of the ld. TPO has been recently passed by the AO on 02nd July, 2024 giving complete relief to the assessee on the issues raised before the Tribunal.
In view of the above, the assessee is permitted to withdraw its appeal. In the result, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 17.10.2024.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026