DCIT, CIRCLE- 1, LTU, NEW DELHI vs. C & S ELECTRIC LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on the grounds of low tax effect, in accordance with CBDT Circulars, but included a rider allowing for restoration of the appeal if specific exceptions apply or for valid reasons. Concurrently, the assessee's Cross Objection was also dismissed following its withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for Assessment Year 2012-13, and the assessee filed a Cross Objection. It was brought to the Tribunal's notice that the Revenue's appeal had a tax effect of Rs. 58,21,082/-, which falls below the enhanced monetary limit of Rs. 60 lacs for low tax effect appeals as per CBDT Circulars. Subsequently, the assessee withdrew its Cross Objection.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal, having a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit, should be dismissed, and the status of the assessee's withdrawn Cross Objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH, ‘I’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
Date of Hearing 17.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement 17.10.2024 ORDER PER BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, AM,
This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 28.09.2018 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2012-13 and the assessee has filed Cross Objection.
At the time of hearing, it was brought to the notice of this Bench by the ld. AR that the appeal filed by the Revenue, admittedly, has a tax effect of Rs.58,21,082/- (as per the chart submitted by the ld. AR) and the same falls into the category of low tax effect appeals after the enhanced monetary limits of Rs.60 lacs, for which the appeal is to be filed by the Department before this Tribunal, as laid down by the CBDT vide Circular Nos.5/2024 dated 15.03.2024 and 09/2024 dated 17.09.2024. The chart submitted by the Ld. AR is reproduced as under:-
Consequent to same, on instructions of assessee, the Ld. AR appearing for the assessee has endorsed, on the Appeal Memo that the ‘assessee’s Cross Objection is withdrawn.
In the light of the aforesaid, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed being a low tax effect appeal with a rider that in case the issue falls in the category of exceptions to the low tax effect appeals or if there is any valid reason, both the sides shall be entitled for restoration of the appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue as well as the Cross Objection of the assessee are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 80IC
- Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-18(1), New DelhiITA 5935/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- M/S. Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. CIT, New DelhiITA 386/DEL/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- M/S Neel Metal Products Ltd., New Delhi vs ACIT, New DelhiITA 3919/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: Disposed10 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
- Indus India, C/O Indus Appliances Pvt Ltd vs ITO, ParwanooITA 852/CHANDI/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- Corbett Nature Reserve, Ramnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ram NagarITA 65/RPR/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Jul 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Sutha vs. The State Tax Officer(Inspection-3)Madras · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026