DCIT CIRCLE-11(1), NEW DELHI vs. HCIL COMTEL LTD, NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal applied CBDT Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, which set a revised monetary limit of Rs.60 Lakhs for filing appeals before the Tribunal. Since the tax effect in this case was below the revised limit, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal as not maintainable, granting liberty for re-institution if exceptions to the circular apply.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal (ITA No.4902/Del/2019) for AY 2013-14 against an assessment order passed under section 143(3). The Departmental Representative indicated that the appeal should be withdrawn as the tax effect involved is below Rs.60 Lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the Tribunal given the low tax effect as per the revised monetary limits set by the CBDT Circular No.09/2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “H”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: The appeal in AY 2013-14, arises out of 1. the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-22, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] in Appeal No. 114/18- 19/CIT(A)-22, New Delhi dated 20.03.2019 against the order of assessment passed u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 20.12.2016 by the Assessing Officer, DCIT, Circle-11(1), New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’).
However, Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) pointed out that the present appeal is to be withdrawn as the tax effect involved in the case is below Rs.60 Lacs.
The CBDT vide Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeals before the Tribunal to Rs.60 Lacs and the said Circular would be applicable to all pending appeals. In such circumstances, the present appeal filed by the Revenue in case of low tax effect is not maintainable.
Before parting, we clarify here that the Revenue shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for re-institution of appeal, if the requisite material is brought to show that the appeal is protected by the exceptions prescribed in para-3.1 and 3.2 of the Circular dated 17.09.2024.
In conclusion, by applying the CBDT Circular dated 17.09.2024, the captioned appeal of the Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn/not pressed.
In the final result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21/10/2024.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026