No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI C.M. GARG & SHRI O.P. MEENA
आदेश /O R D E R
PER SHRI C.M. GARG, JM
This appeal has been filed by the revenue against the order of
the learned CIT(A), Ujjain, dated 7.12.2016 in First Appeal No. U-
209/2015-16 for the assessment year 2011-12. 1
Suresh Soni ITA No. 173/Ind/2017 2. The only issue raised by the revenue in this appeal is that the
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was not justified in deleting
the disallowance ofRs.2,47,000/- on account of payment made in
contravention to provision of section 40A(3) of the Act.
During the course of assessment proceedings the Assessing
Officer observed that the assessee has made cash payment
exceeding Rs. 20,000/-. He, therefore, issued notice u/s 142(1) of
the Act. In response thereto, the assessee filed details of cash
payments on scrutiny of which the Assessing Officer found that the
assessee has tried to bifurcate the payment of bills/vouchers with
the intention to show that the payments are below Rs. 20,000/-.
However, the Assessing Officer did not accept the same. The
Assessing Officer, accordingly, disallowed Rs. 2,47,500/- and added
the same to the total income of the assessee u/s 40A(3) of the Act.
On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) allowed the
appeal of the assessee. Now the revenue is in appeal before the
Tribunal.
Before us, the learned DR supported the order of the
Assessing Officer while opposing the order of the Commissioner of
Suresh Soni ITA No. 173/Ind/2017 Income Tax (Appeals). On the other hand, the learned counsel for
the assessee strongly relied upon the order of the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals).
After careful consideration of the rival submissions of the
parties and the relevant material placed on record of the Tribunal,
we find that the assessee has filed partywise bifurcation of the cash
payments made. On verification of the same, the Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals) found that the assessee has not made any
payment in excess of Rs. 20,000/- to individual person in a single
day and as such the assessee’s case does not fall within the
provisions of section 40A(3) of the Act. We, therefore, find no flaw in
the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and
accordingly confirm the same.
In the result, the appeal of the revenue stands dismissed.
The order has been pronounced in open Court on 5th May,
2017.
Sd/- sd/- लेखा सद�य �या�यक सद�य (O.P.Meena) (C.M. Garg) Accountant Member Judicial Member May 5 , 2017 3