SHRI DR. ASHOK SHARMA,INDORE vs. THE ITO-1(1), INDORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 188/IND/2016Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 May 2017AY 2002-035 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's submission, supported by an affidavit, that the cash deposits were out of withdrawals from his salary account in another bank. Therefore, the addition was deleted.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 2,24,500/- to the assessee's total income for cash deposits in a savings bank account. The CIT(A) restricted this addition to Rs. 77,500/-, which the assessee contested.

What were the issues?

Whether cash deposits in a savings bank account, claimed to be out of withdrawals from another account, constitute unexplained income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: SHRI C.M. GARG & SHRI O.P. MEENA

For Appellant: Shri S.T. Jethani, Shri Mohd. Javed - DR

आदेश /O R D E R

PER SHRI C.M. GARG, JM

This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of

the learned CIT(A)-32, New Delhi, having concurrent jurisdiction

over CIT(A)-II, Indore, dated 20.1.2016 in First Appeal No. IT-

292/15-16/181 for the assessment year 2002-03.

Dr. Ashok Sharma ITA No. 188/Ind/2016 2. At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee did

not press ground no. 1. The same is, therefore, dismissed as such.

3.

Ground no. 2 is that the credits to the saving bank account, in

cash, deposits amounting to Rs.77,500/- have been added to the

total income of the assessee by the authorities below against the

facts of the case.

4.

Briefly stated, the assessee derives income from salary from

the State Government. A notice u/s 148 of the Act was issued.

However, the assessee did not file any return in response thereto.

The Assessing Officer issued notice u/s 142(1) of the Act in

response to which the assessee filed written submissions without

filing the return in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act. The

Assessing Officer, therefore, passed ex–parte assessment order u/s

144 of the Act. In the assessment order total deposits of

Rs.2,24,500/- in respect of S.B. Account No. 1190010152 have

been added. It includes some cheques/transfers/deposits as well,

the details of which are given at page 3 of the assessment order. It

was the submission of the assessee before the Assessing Officer

that the cash deposits were only to the extent of Rs.77,500/- which

Dr. Ashok Sharma ITA No. 188/Ind/2016 are out of withdrawals from another bank account. However, the

Assessing Officer did not accept this contention of the assessee.

The Assessing Officer, therefore, made the addition of Rs.2,24,500/-

On appeal, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) after

considering the issue, restricted the addition of Rs. 2,24,500/- to

Rs.77,500/- i.e. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

maintained the addition of Rs. 77,500/- towards deposits out of

withdrawals. Against this action of the Commissioner of Income

Tax (Appeals), the assessee is in appeal before us.

5.

We have heard both the sides. Before us, the learned counsel

for the assessee filed an affidavit sworn in by the assessee to the

effect that the assessee was getting salary from the Department of

Health and Family Welfare and during the relevant period he was

posted at Bhopal. The said salary was deposited by the assessee in

his bank account and since the family of the assessee was residing

at Indore, he used to withdraw cash from his salary account at

Bhopal and out of the cash withdrawal, he used to deposit the said

cash into savings bank account with State Bank of Indore, MYH

Campus Branch, Indore. The learned counsel for the assessee,

Dr. Ashok Sharma ITA No. 188/Ind/2016 therefore, submitted that whatever cash was deposited, it was out

of the withdrawal from the assessee’s bank account being

maintained at Bhopal. These facts mentioned in the affidavit of the

assessee have not been controverted by the learned DR.

6.

We have considered the submissions of both the sides. From

the affidavit filed by the assessee before us it is apparent that

whatever cash was deposited in the bank account at Indore was

withdrawn by the assessee from his bank account being maintained

at Bhopal. The contents of the said affidavit have not been

controverted by the learned DR. We, therefore, direct the Assessing

Officer to delete the addition of Rs.77,500/- towards cash deposits.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

The order has been pronounced in open Court on 9th May,

2017.

Sd/- sd/-

लेखा सद�य �या�यक सद�य (O.P.Meena) (C.M. Garg) Accountant Member Judicial Member May 9, 2017.

Dn/ 4

Dr. Ashok Sharma ITA No. 188/Ind/2016

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →