ALMADARASATHUN NISWANUL FAIZUL BARAKATH TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was prevented by a reasonable cause from complying with the CIT's requests. Therefore, the CIT(Exemptions) was directed to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to present the required details.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application due to non-compliance with requests for clarification. The assessee claimed they did not receive the letters due to an employee's leave and illness.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee had a reasonable cause for not responding to the CIT's notices, and if so, whether they should be granted another opportunity for registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P.GEORGE & SHRI DUVVURU R.L.REDDY
PER DUVVURU R.L.REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai, dated 12.02.2018 passed under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961[“Act” in short] rejecting grant of registration.
The assessee, constituted by a trust deed dated 20.03.2006, filed an application in Form 10A for registration under section 12AA of the Act on 21.08.2017. While processing the application, the assessee trust was requested to furnish clarification/explanation. Since there was no response
:- 2 -: ITA No.1848/Chny/2018 from assessee trust, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for registration under section 12AA of the Act as the assessee trust has not complied with the requirements of registration as contained in section 12AA(1)(a) of the Act.
By referring to the grounds of appeal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the activities of the trust are carried out in a town – Cumbum near Madurai where a full-fledged office is run and the registered office in Chennai has only one employee who was on leave between 15.01.2018 and 15.02.2018 due to ill health, thereby, the letters calling for details were not received by the assessee and not served on them. Thus, the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause in not complying with the letters issued by the ld. CIT(E) and prayed that the assessee may be given one more opportunity of being heard to present the details required for processing the application for grant of registration. To this plea, the ld. DR did not seriously object. Being so, as the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause in not complying with the letters calling for details, we direct the ld. CIT(E) to give one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the application filed for grant of registration under section 12AA of the Act.
:- 3 -: ITA No.1848/Chny/2018
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on the 31st day of October, 2018, in Chennai.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026