ALMADARASATHUN NISWANUL FAIZUL BARAKATH TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1848/CHNY/2018Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 October 20183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessee was prevented by a reasonable cause from complying with the CIT's requests. Therefore, the CIT(Exemptions) was directed to provide one more opportunity to the assessee to present the required details.

What were the facts?

The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application due to non-compliance with requests for clarification. The assessee claimed they did not receive the letters due to an employee's leave and illness.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee had a reasonable cause for not responding to the CIT's notices, and if so, whether they should be granted another opportunity for registration.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABRAHAM P.GEORGE & SHRI DUVVURU R.L.REDDY

Hearing: 24.10.2018Pronounced: 31.10.2018

PER DUVVURU R.L.REDDY, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai, dated 12.02.2018 passed under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961[“Act” in short] rejecting grant of registration.

2.

The assessee, constituted by a trust deed dated 20.03.2006, filed an application in Form 10A for registration under section 12AA of the Act on 21.08.2017. While processing the application, the assessee trust was requested to furnish clarification/explanation. Since there was no response

:- 2 -: ITA No.1848/Chny/2018 from assessee trust, the ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for registration under section 12AA of the Act as the assessee trust has not complied with the requirements of registration as contained in section 12AA(1)(a) of the Act.

3.

By referring to the grounds of appeal, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the activities of the trust are carried out in a town – Cumbum near Madurai where a full-fledged office is run and the registered office in Chennai has only one employee who was on leave between 15.01.2018 and 15.02.2018 due to ill health, thereby, the letters calling for details were not received by the assessee and not served on them. Thus, the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause in not complying with the letters issued by the ld. CIT(E) and prayed that the assessee may be given one more opportunity of being heard to present the details required for processing the application for grant of registration. To this plea, the ld. DR did not seriously object. Being so, as the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause in not complying with the letters calling for details, we direct the ld. CIT(E) to give one more opportunity of being heard to the assessee and decide the application filed for grant of registration under section 12AA of the Act.

:- 3 -: ITA No.1848/Chny/2018

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on the 31st day of October, 2018, in Chennai.

More judgments on Section 12AA

All 4,243 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AA →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →