BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD.,GURGAON vs. ITO, WARD- 1(1)(2), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION , NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal dismissed the current appeal for statistical purposes, acknowledging that no proceedings can continue due to the NCLT moratorium covering the assessee's case. Liberty was granted for the parties to seek revival of the appeal if the NCLT order is reversed or modified by a higher judicial forum.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2006-07 is against orders from the CIT(A) and ITO under the Income Tax Act. Earlier appeals for AY 2007-08 and 2008-09 in the assessee's own case were dismissed due to a moratorium granted by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
What were the issues?
Can the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal proceed with the appeal when the National Company Law Tribunal has imposed a moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code on the assessee?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, DELHI
Before: MS. MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI NAVEEN CHANDRA
The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 01.10.2018 passed by the CIT(A)-42, New Delhi, arising out of the order dated 05.03.2009 passed by the ITO, TDS-I(1)
International Taxation, Delhi, under Section 201(1) & 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for Assessment Year 2006-07.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of hearing of the appeal. However, the Ld. D.R submitted a copy of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench in & for Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2008-09 respectively in assessee’s own case whereby and whereunder both the appeals stood dismissed in view of the judgment passed on 17.01.2020 by the National Company Law Tribunal, where the said Tribunal under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) granted moratorium in terms of Section 14 of the said Code.
Having regard to the said moratorium declared by the NCLT since no proceeding in any Court of Law, Tribunal etc. can continue those appeals stood dismissed. As the said order passed by the NCLT covers assessee’s case this appeal for A.Y. 2006-07 the instant appeal is also dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the parties to seek revival of appeal in the event the order of NCLT is reversed and/or modified by the higher judicial forum in the interest of justice. Hence, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed for statistical purposes.
Assessee’s appeal is, thus, dismissed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 14.11.2024
More judgments on Section 201(1)
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- Tmw Fintech Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 14(1)(2), MumbaiITA 30/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- State Bank of India, Guna vs Income Tax Officer, TDS, GwaliorITA 432/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- State Bank of India Regional Business… vs Income Tax Officer, TDS Gwalior, GwaliorITA 420/AGR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- State Bank of India, Tikamgarh vs Income Tax Officer, TDS ITO (TDS) Gwalior…ITA 411/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026