Facts
The assessee appealed against an ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2017-18, which had confirmed the AO's order. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee's appeal because no one appeared on their behalf, reportedly without considering an adjournment application.
Held
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order violated the principles of natural justice by not providing a proper opportunity of being heard. To prevent a miscarriage of justice, the Tribunal quashed the CIT(A)'s order and remitted the issue back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, directing that the assessee be granted a proper opportunity to present their case.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing a proper opportunity of hearing and considering the assessee's adjournment application, thereby violating principles of natural justice.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The assessee has filed the instant appeal against the order dated 07.12.2023 passed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi. Since none appeared on behalf of the assessee having no other alternative, the appeal was dismissed confirming the order passed by the Learned AO. (for Assessment Year 2017-18).
The order passed by the Learned CIT(A) is found to be an ex- Page1 parte that too without taking into consideration the adjournment application made by the assessee. CIT(A)’s order is found to have been made violating the principle of natural justice as no proper opportunity has been provided to the assessee and hence liable to be quashed. However, in order to prevent mis-carriage of justice. In my considered opinion the assessee be given further opportunity of being heard to represent his case effectively.
Hence the appeal is disposed of by remitting the issue to the file of Learned CIT(A) for his consideration afresh. He has further directed to grant an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and upon considering the evidence on record or any other evidence which the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing of the appeal. With the aforesaid observation assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18th November, 2024.