Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Learned CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi. The CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal ex-parte because the assessee failed to appear on four occasions, thereby confirming an addition made by the AO related to a cash deposit for Assessment Year 2017-18.
Held
The Tribunal observed that the assessee's counsel contended the assessee could not present their case before the CIT(A) and the issue of cash deposit was not properly addressed. With no objection from the Departmental Representative, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration, directing an opportunity of hearing and review of all evidence.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal ex-parte without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY
PER MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
The assessee has filed the instant appeal against the order dated 23.01.2024 passed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi. Since none appeared on behalf of the assessee on four occasions having no other alternative, the appeal was dismissed confirming the order passed by the Learned AO. (for Assessment Year 2017- 18). Page1 Bhagwan Daas 2. At the time of hearing of the instant appeal the Learned counsel appearing for the assessee submitted before us that as the assessee could not appear before the Learned CIT(A) and thus, the issue involved in this particular case relating to cash deposit could not be explained and hence addition was upheld by the First Appellate Authority. It is was further clarified that certain details explaining the source of cash deposit though were filed before the authority below the same were not considered in its proper prospective and addition was made. In that view of the fact he pressed for further opportunity of being heard before the Learned CIT(A) to enable him to deal with the issue effectively which has not been objected by the Learned DR with all his fairness.
Having regard to the above aspect of the matter in my opinion the assessee be given a further opportunity to redress its grievances before the First Appellate Authority effectively and hence the issue is set to the file of Learned CIT(A) for his consideration afresh. He has further directed to grant an opportunity of being heard to the assessee and to consider the evidence on record or any other evidence which the assessee may choose to file at the time of hearing of the appeal. With the Page2
Order pronounced in the open court on 18th November, 2024.