CMS COMPUTERS LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 3(2), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The CIT(A) restricted the addition to 12.5% of the bogus purchases, estimating profit on the basis that corresponding sales were accepted. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with this decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared a loss, but the AO received information about bogus purchases from sales tax authorities. The AO added the entire amount of these bogus purchases to the assessee's income.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition for bogus purchases should be the entire amount or only the estimated profit margin. Whether the CIT(A)'s estimation of profit at 12.5% was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C”, BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI R.C.SHARMA, AM & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM
आदेश / O R D E R PER R.C.SHARMA (A.M):
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A)- 51, Mumbai dated 22/03/2017 for A.Y.2009-10 in the matter of order passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the IT Act. 2. The grievance of assessee relates to upholding the addition of 12.5% in respect of bogus purchases. Nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee inspite of giving the opportunity, the Bench, therefore, decided to dispose of the appeal after hearing learned DR and considering the material placed on record.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- The State Of Karnataka vs. M/S Itd Cemindia JvKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Aman Motors vs. The Commissioner CGST & Ors.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Imperial Marketing vs. Principal Commissioner Of CGST Delhi NorthDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Om.S.R. Construction, Through Its Proprietor Mr. Kuldeep Sharma vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Its Commissioner, Commerical Tax DepartmentJharkhand · 28 Oct 2026