ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. THE LAXMI CO-OP. BANK LTD.,,

The learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue at the outset pointed out that though several grounds of appeal are raised but the effective grounds of appeal are grounds of appeal No.1 and 8, which read as under:-

The learned Authorized Representative for the assessee pointed out that the issue raised in ground of appeal No.1 i.e. deletion of addition made on account of accrued interest on NPAs under section 43D of the Act is squarely covered by the ratio laid down by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. (2015) 379 ITR 24 (Bom).

The learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue on the other hand, placed reliance on the order of Assessing Officer.

We find that similar issue as before us arose in bunch of appeals with the lead order in ITA No.1641/PN/2014 in the case of JCIT Vs. M/s. Peoples Co-operative Bank Ltd., relating to assessment year 2011-12 vide order dated 05.02.2016, wherein the Tribunal in turn relied on earlier decision in Kolhapur Mahila Sahakari Bank Ltd. Vs. ITO in ITA No.01/PN/2013, relating to assessment year 2009-10, vide order dated 29.01.2014. The Tribunal in turn following the ratio laid down by the Pune Bench of Tribunal in ACIT Vs. Osmanabad Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd. in ITA No.795/PN/2011, order dated 31.08.2012, held as under:- “2. The assessee is a Co-operative Bank engaged in the business of accepting deposits from members and giving loans to members. It has filed its return of income on 11.09.2009 for the year under consideration declaring total income at ₹ 14,57,840/-. In the scrutiny assessment, the Assessing Officer noticed that the assessee had not credited interest receivable or accrued on non-performing assets (hereinafter referred to as NPA) to its profit and loss account for financial year 2008-09. The Assessing Officer after rejecting the various contentions of the assessee has held that the RBI guidelines are not intended to regulate the income tax law and the assessee was liable to be assessed on accrual basis u/s.5 of I.T. Act for the reasons (i) benefits extended

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in CIT Vs. M/s. Deogiri Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd. (supra) has laid down the proposition that the interest accrued on NPAs is not taxable in the hands of assessee, in view of the guidelines issued by the RBI.

Following the same parity of reasoning, we hold that no addition is warranted on account of interest accrued on NPAs. Accordingly, we uphold the order of CIT(A) in deleting the addition made on account of interest accrued on NPAs. The ground of appeal No.1 raised by the Revenue is dismissed.

The second issue raised vide ground of appeal No.8 is against deletion of addition made on account of amortization of premium on investments.

The learned Authorized Representative for the assessee pointed out that this issue also stands covered by different decisions of Pune Bench of Tribunal.

The learned Departmental Representative for the Revenue placed reliance on the order of Assessing Officer.

We find that the Pune Bench of Tribunal in series of decisions has decided the issue in favour of assessee. However, we make reference to the decision of the Tribunal in ACIT Vs. Jath Urban Co-op. Bank Ltd. in ITA Nos.2713 & 2714/PUN/2016, relating to assessment years 2007-08 & 2008-09, order dated 23.03.2018. The ground of appeal No.8 raised by the Revenue is thus, dismissed.

In the result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed.