M/S MADHESHIYA VAISHYA SEVA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to be heard due to the notice being sent to the wrong address, violating principles of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, applied for registration under Section 12A. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application as a notice sent to the trust's registered office was returned unserved, preventing verification.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) rightly rejected the application without affording the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘B’
Before: SHRI N.V VASUDEVAN & SHRI JASON P BOAZ
PER SHRI N.V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 22/9/2017 of Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru rejecting an application by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act.
The assessee is a trust. It was formed under deed of trust dated 21/2/2015. The object of the assessee was for advancing the cause of education, knowledge, sports, training, finance assistance to the poor and needy etc. The assessee filed an application for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act on 31/3/2017. In the prescribed for making such application viz., Form No.10, the address of the assessee has been given as 422, Radiant White Orchihd, Banerghatta Road, Bengaluru-560 076.
The CIT(A) (Exemption) Bengaluru issued a letter dated 11/9/2017 calling for certain clarifications. It appears that this letter was sent to the registered office of the trust as given in the deed of trust viz., 3rd Floor, ‘Shubh Nivas’, No.31, ‘3rd Block’, 18th Cross, Vishwapriya Layout, Begur Road, Bangalore – 560 068. The letter was unserved because it was not the address in which the assessee trust operated. Since the letter was returned with the postal endorsement ‘left’, the CIT (Exemptions) was of the view that it was not possible to verify the satisfaction of the condition for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act. He, therefore, dismissed the application for grant of registration.
Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the CIT(Exemptions), the assessee has preferred the present appeal before the Tribunal.
We have heard the rival submissions. It is clear from the impugned order that the assessee did not have proper opportunity of being heard and there was violation of the principles of natural justice. Admittedly, the notice by the CIT (Exemptions) calling for explanation was sent to the wrong address and, therefore, there was no compliance from the side of the assessee. Keeping in mind the aforesaid facts, we are of the view that it would be just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order and direct the CIT(Exemptions) to examine afresh the application for grant of registration filed by the assessee on 31/3/2017 after affording the assessee proper opportunity of being heard. We hold and direct accordingly. The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25th April, 2018.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026