M/S MADHESHIYA VAISHYA SEVA TRUST,BANGALORE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( EXEMPTION), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2663/BANG/2017Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 April 2018AY 2017-184 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee was not given a proper opportunity to be heard due to the notice being sent to the wrong address, violating principles of natural justice.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a trust, applied for registration under Section 12A. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application as a notice sent to the trust's registered office was returned unserved, preventing verification.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemptions) rightly rejected the application without affording the assessee a proper opportunity of being heard.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, BANGALORE BENCH ‘B’

Before: SHRI N.V VASUDEVAN & SHRI JASON P BOAZ

For Appellant: Shri Suresh Muthukrishnan, C.A
For Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT

PER SHRI N.V VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER :

1.

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 22/9/2017 of Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions), Bengaluru rejecting an application by the assessee for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act.

2.

The assessee is a trust. It was formed under deed of trust dated 21/2/2015. The object of the assessee was for advancing the cause of education, knowledge, sports, training, finance assistance to the poor and needy etc. The assessee filed an application for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act on 31/3/2017. In the prescribed for making such application viz., Form No.10, the address of the assessee has been given as 422, Radiant White Orchihd, Banerghatta Road, Bengaluru-560 076.

3.

The CIT(A) (Exemption) Bengaluru issued a letter dated 11/9/2017 calling for certain clarifications. It appears that this letter was sent to the registered office of the trust as given in the deed of trust viz., 3rd Floor, ‘Shubh Nivas’, No.31, ‘3rd Block’, 18th Cross, Vishwapriya Layout, Begur Road, Bangalore – 560 068. The letter was unserved because it was not the address in which the assessee trust operated. Since the letter was returned with the postal endorsement ‘left’, the CIT (Exemptions) was of the view that it was not possible to verify the satisfaction of the condition for grant of registration u/s 12A of the Act. He, therefore, dismissed the application for grant of registration.

4.

Aggrieved by the aforesaid order of the CIT(Exemptions), the assessee has preferred the present appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

We have heard the rival submissions. It is clear from the impugned order that the assessee did not have proper opportunity of being heard and there was violation of the principles of natural justice. Admittedly, the notice by the CIT (Exemptions) calling for explanation was sent to the wrong address and, therefore, there was no compliance from the side of the assessee. Keeping in mind the aforesaid facts, we are of the view that it would be just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order and direct the CIT(Exemptions) to examine afresh the application for grant of registration filed by the assessee on 31/3/2017 after affording the assessee proper opportunity of being heard. We hold and direct accordingly. The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 25th April, 2018.

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →