SRI HIRANMOY DAS,DURGAPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE - 1, DURGAPUR, DURGAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the penalty proceedings back to the CIT(A) to be decided afresh after the decision in the quantum appeal. This was done in the interest of justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) for undisclosed income. The quantum proceedings related to this addition were still pending before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) can be adjudicated before the final decision in the related quantum appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “D” KOLKATA
Before: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. A.L. Saini
O R D E R
PER S.S.Godara, Judicial Member:
- This assessee appeal for assessment year2013-14 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Durgapur’s order dated 23.02.2018 passed in case No.178/CIT(A)/DGP/2016-17 upholding Assessing Officer’s action imposing proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
The assessee’s sole substantive grievance pleaded in instant appeal challenges correctness of both the lower authorities action imposing u/s 271(1)(c) penalty in issue amounting to ₹6,00,942/- regarding sundry credits of ₹25,11,464/- treated as undisclosed income during the course of quantum proceedings. The Assessing Officer had admittedly framed his assessment on Sri Hiranmoy Das Vs. ACIT, Cir-1, DGP Page 2 15.03.2016 making the impugned addition he sought to know about the final outcome of the said quantum proceedings. We are informed that assessee’s quantum lower appellate appeal is still awaiting the CIT(A)-Durgapur’s final adjudication. We deem it appropriate in these facts and circumstances that larger interest of justice would be met in case the instant lis is restored back to the CIT(A) to be decided afresh as per law after his decision in quantum appeal. We order accordingly. The CIT(A) shall adjudicate the assessee’s lower instant penalty proceedings after his decision in appeal in above.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026