VOLITI FOUNDATION,MEERUT vs. ITO,WARD-2(3), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3660/DEL/2024Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 December 2024AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA (Judicial Member)2 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, dismissing the appeal. Given the assessee's inability to provide any further details or evidence regarding expenditure, the Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the rejection of the Section 11 exemption claim.

What were the facts?

Voliti Foundation appealed against the rejection of its Section 11 exemption claim for AY 2014-15 by lower authorities, resulting in all receipts being assessed without benefit. A 486-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned, but the assessee's counsel confirmed no further details could be presented even if an additional opportunity was provided.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the assessee's Section 11 exemption claim was justified when the assessee failed to provide supporting details for expenditure.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11,Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA

For Appellant: Shri Ramit Kakkar, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Siddharth B.S. Meena, Sr. DR
Hearing: 19.12.2024Pronounced: 19.12.2024

O R D E R

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM:

1.

This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15 arises against National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1049751812(1), dated 14.02.2023, in case no. CIT(A), Delhi-40/10416/2016-17, in proceedings u/s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

2.

It transpires that there is delay of 486 days in filing the assessee’s instant appeal. For the reasons stated by the assessee in it’s condonation petition explaining the delay in filing the instant appeal on account of circumstances

3.

It emerges during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities have rejected the assessee’s section 11 exemption claim. It is further pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the assessee that all of it’s receipts have been assessed without giving any benefit of exemption u/s 11 of the Act. I put a specific query to the learned counsel as to whether the said expenditure could be pleaded and proved if the assessee is afforded one more inning before the Assessing Officer. The reply received from the assessee’s side is categorically negative only. That being the case and in absence of any detail forthcoming from the assessee’s side, I have no other option but to uphold the learned lower authorities’ impugned action on both the foregoing counts. Rejected accordingly.

4.

This assessee’s appeal is dismissed.

Order pronounced in open court on 19.12.2024.

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →