AMIT SHUKLA, KUMHARI ,KUMHARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(5), BHILAI, BHILAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 301/RPR/2024Status: DisposedITAT Raipur16 January 2025AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal request. Consequently, the Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals, and both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee had filed appeals against orders passed by the CIT(A) and AO under sections 271(1)(c) and 147 r.w.s. 144 for AY 2011-12. Subsequently, the assessee requested to withdraw these appeals, stating that they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and provided supporting documents.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeals filed by the assessee should be allowed to be withdrawn upon their opting for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271(1)(c),Section 147 r.w.s.144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAIPUR BENCH, RAIPUR

Before: SHRI RAVISH SOOD & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

For Appellant: Shri Amit Shukla, Assessee
For Respondent: Smt. Anubhaa Tah Goel, Sr. DR
Hearing: 15.01.2025Pronounced: 16.01.2025

आदेश / ORDER PER BENCH: The captioned appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the respective orders passed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC), Delhi, dated 24.04.2024 and 12.08.2023, which in turn arises from the orders passed by the A.O under Sec. 271(1)(c) and 147 r.w.s.144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 14.06.2019 and 12.12.2018, both for the assessment year 2011-12.

2.

The assessee appellant has filed a letter dated 16.12.2024, where he has sought liberty to withdraw the captioned appeals for the reason that he has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. For the sake of clarity, the aforesaid letter dated 16.12.2024 is culled out as under:

3 Amit Shukla Vs. ITO-1(5), Bhilai & 338/RPR/2024

3.

Per contra, the Ld. Sr. Departmental Representative (for short ‘DR’) did not raise objection to the seeking of the withdrawal of the captioned appeals.

4.

Considering the aforesaid facts, we herein permit the assessee appellant to withdraw both the aforementioned captioned appeals.

5.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.

More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)

All 25,141 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271(1)(c) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →