Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Before: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned CIT(A)-XXV, New Delhi dated 03.11.2014 for the assessment year 2011-12.
None is present on behalf of the assessee. Notice for hearing was sent through registered post at the address given in the appeal papers, which is deemed to be served on the assessee, as not returned back. No any written request for adjournment on behalf of the assessee is also available on record. It, therefore, appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed in limine for want of prosecution in view of the orders of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, the appeal is dismissed, as indicated above. Order is pronounced in the open court on 4th June, 2018. Sd/- Sd/- (Bhavnesh Saini) (L.P. Sahu) Judicial member Accountant Member Dated: 4th June, 2018 *aks* Copy of order forwarded to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) Commissioner (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Delhi Benches, New Delhi
Date 1. Draft dictated (DNS) 04.06.18 PS 2. Draft placed before author 04.06.18 PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM/AM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM/AM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on PS 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk PS 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order.