BANK OF INDIA EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,KANPUR vs. ITO, CIVIL LINES
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that there was sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A), falling within the meaning of Section 249(3) of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside, and the CIT(A) was directed to condone the delay, admit the appeal, and pass a de novo order on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
For A.Y. 2022-23, the Assessing Officer determined the assessee's total income and made an addition of Rs. 9,52,547/- as a deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d). The assessee's appeal to the CIT(A) was dismissed on limitation grounds without addressing the merits of the case.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the assessee's appeal on limitation grounds without condoning the delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH ‘SMC’, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA
2022-23 against impugned appellate order dated 29/09/2025 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025- 26/1081298759(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short].
(B) In this case assessment order dated 19/03/2024 was passed by the Assessing Officer whereby the assessee’s total income was determined at Assessment Year:2022-23 2 Rs.9,52,547/-. In the aforesaid assessment order, an addition of Rs.9,52,547/- was made, claimed by the assessee as deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the I. T. Act. The assessee filed appeal in the office of the learned CIT(A). The learned CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal on limitation ground without going into merits of the case. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal against the aforesaid order of the learned CIT(A).
(C) At the time of hearing, representative for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) unfairly and unjustly dismissed the assessee’s application for condonation of delay in filing of appeal. He further submitted that the impugned appellate order of learned CIT(A) should be set aside with the direction to pass de novo order on merits. The learned Departmental Representative supported the impugned order of learned CIT(A), but left the matter to the discretion of Bench. On perusal of records, it is evident that the learned CIT(A) dismissed the assessee’s appeal on limitation ground, treating the assessee’s appeal as time barred. The assessee’s application for condonation of delay was not considered favourably by learned CIT(A). From the records, it is evident that there was sufficient cause, within the meaning of section 249(3) of the Act because of which the assessee could not file appeal in the office of learned CIT(A) within time frame mentioned in section 249(2) of the Act. Accordingly, it is held that this was a fit case for the learned CIT(A) to condone the delay in filing of the appeal in his office and to admit the appeal for decision on merits. Having regard to the same, the impugned appellate order dated 29/09/2025 of learned CIT(A) is set aside and learned CIT(A) is directed to admit the appeal after condoning the delay in filing of appeal. Learned CIT(A) is further directed to pass de novo order on merits in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 05/02/2026)
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026