MANOJ KUMAR SONI ,BANDA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 5(4), BANDA , BANDA

The facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and filed his return of income showing total income at Rs.2,80,120/-. The assessee has shown STCG of Rs.2,80,000/-. During the assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer found that the assessee had purchased a car amounting to Rs.28,00,000/- which remained unexplained during the enquiry proceedings. The Assessing Officer issued various notices to the assessee to explain the source of income out of which the purchase of car was made. In view of non compliance by the assessee to statutory notices and show cause notice, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment ex- parte by determining the total income of the assessee at Rs.30,80,120/- and made an addition of Rs.28,00,000/- on account of unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act. Aggrieved with the order passed by the Assessing Officer, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the learned CIT(A). The assessee’s appeal against the aforesaid addition was dismissed by the learned CIT(A) vide order dated 19/11/2024. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the aforesaid impugned appellate order dated 19/11/2024 of learned CIT(A).

During the course of hearing before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, none was present on behalf of the assessee. Therefore, we proceeded to decide the issue after hearing learned D.R. and perusing the material available on record. The assessee vide its ground No. 4 of the appeal has himself accepted that due to lack of lawful knowledge, the assessee had not submitted the valid documents and if opportunity is afforded, the same will be produced with all objects lawful papers/documents along with supporting evidences. In view of the

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.