METROPOLITAN STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 14, MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the subsequent assessment order made no additions. The Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer passed an order under section 143(3) read with section 263, accepting the total income without any additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed against a revision order is maintainable when a subsequent assessment order has been passed without additions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
AadoSa / O R D E R महावीर स िंह, न्याययक दस्य/ PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is arising out of the order of Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Mumbai [in short PCIT], Appeal No. Pr. CIT-14/263/2017-18 vide order dated 28.03.2018. The ITAs No. 916/Mum/2018 Assessment was framed by the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 14(2)(2), Mumbai (in short ‘DCIT/ITO/ AO’) for the A.Y. 2013-14 vide order dated 31.03.2016 under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’).
The learned counsel for the assessee moved an application dated 18.03.2019 and seeking withdrawal of this appeal by stating the following reason: - “This is in reference to the caption appeal filed by appellant against the order dated 28.03.2018 passed under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, (the ‘Act’), by CIT-14, Mumbai for AY 2013-14 (‘revision order’). The hearing in the matter of appeal is scheduled for tomorrow i.e. on 19.03.2019. In this regard, on behalf of and under instruction of our above mentioned client, we would like to humbly submit that in pursuance of the aforesaid revision order dated 28.03.2018, the Ld. ACIT 14(2)(2), Mumbai (‘AO’) has passed an order dated 27.12.2018 under section 143(3) read with section 263 of the Act, making the assessment without any additions and thus accepted the total income as earlier in the assessment order dated 31.03.2016. In view of the aforesaid, the appellant respectfully withdraws the captioned appeal.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026