SHENZHEN SHANDONG NUCLEAR POWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 4(2)(1), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeals as withdrawn, accepting the assessee's request in light of the MAP resolution. The MAP resolution provided a framework for taxing offshore supply, offshore service, and onshore contracts.
What were the facts?
The assessee sought withdrawal of its grounds of appeal concerning the taxability of offshore service, supply, and onshore contracts. This withdrawal was based on a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) resolution reached between the competent authorities of India and China.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the taxability of offshore and onshore contracts. The resolution of this issue was achieved through a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) under the India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “J” MUMBAI
Before: SHRI C.N. PRASAD & SHRI N.K. PRADHAN
ORDER PER BENCH The dispute here is the taxability of offshore service and supply contract as well as taxability of onshore contract.
Before us, the Ld. counsel of the assessee files a written submission requesting for withdrawal of grounds of appeal on taxability of offshore service and supply contract, stating the following: “Re : Shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Co. Ltd. (‘SSNP’) Sub: Regarding withdrawn of grounds of taxability of offshore service and offshore supply contract in relation to appeal filed before your goodself bearing for AY 2009-10, 2053/Mum/2015 for AY 2010-11 & 1052/Mum/2016 for AY 2011-12. This is in connection to the above captioned subject, wherein appeal has been filed by SSNP for AY 2009-10, AY 2010-11 & 2011-12 in relation to taxability of offshore service and offshore supply contract before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
Shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power 3 & Ors SSNP had filed application under Mutual Agreement Procedure (‘MAP’) for offshore service and offshore supply contract before the competent authority of China in accordance with article 25 of China India Double Taxation Agreement (DTA). The Competent Authority of India and China after having examined the facts of the case and issues involved therein have arrived at the following resolution in terms of Article 25 of India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement read with section 90 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 44H of Income-tax Rules, 1962: (i) Income from Off-shore Supply Contract is taxable only in China; and (ii) Receipts from Off-shore Service Contract is taxable in India on gross basis at the tax rate of 10% We have enclosed copy of MAP Resolution arrived at by both the competent authorities for your kind reference. In view of the same, we would like to inform your goodself that SSNP accepts the MAP resolution passed by the Competent Authorities of India and China in terms of Article 25 of the India China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement read with Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 44H of the Income Tax Rule, 1962. In connection to the above, we would like to inform the Hon’ble Members that SSNP withdraws the grounds pertaining to taxability of offshore services and offshore supply contract in view of acceptance of the MAP resolution.” 2.1 In similar vein, the Ld. counsel requests for withdrawal of grounds of appeal on taxability on onshore contract, which is produced below: “Re : Shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Co. Ltd. (‘SSNP’)
Shenzhen Shandong Nuclear Power 4 & Ors Sub: Regarding withdrawn of grounds of taxability of onshore contract in relation to appeal filed before your goodself bearing ITA No. 1050/Ahd/2014 for AY 2009-10, 2053/Mum/2015 for AY 2010-11 & 1052/Mum/2016 for AY 2011-12 & ITA No. 1053/Mum/2016 for AY 2012- 13. This is in connection to the above captioned subject, wherein appeal has been filed by SSNP for AY 2009-10, AY 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13 in relation to taxability of onshore contract before the Tribunal. SSNP had filed application under Mutual Agreement Procedure (‘MAP’) for onshore contract before the competent authority of China in accordance with article 25 of China India Double Taxation Agreement (DTA). The Competent Authorities of India and China after having examined the facts of the case and issues involved therein have arrived at the following resolution in terms of Article 25 of India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement read with section 90 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 44H of Income-tax Rules, 1962. The profits/Net Income of project office/PE taxable in India from Onshore Contracts is as under: Assessment Years Profits/Net Income Taxable in India from Onshore Contracts (Rs.) 2009-10 2,34,07,926/- 2010-11 7,06,68,203/- 2011-12 2,31,42,599/- 2012-13 67,82,568/- In view of the same, we would like to inform your goodself that SSNP accepts the MAP resolution passed by the Competent Authorities of India and China in terms of Article 25 of the India China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement read with Section 90 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Rule 44H of the Income Tax Rules 1962.
More judgments on Section 90
- Amar Rameshkumar Bhalodia, Rajkot vs The ACIT, Circle-1(1), RajkotITA 641/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Fireeye Ireland Limited, Ireland vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITITA 1431/DEL/2025[2022-2023]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-2023
- Archana Gupta, New Delhi vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3123/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Shishir Dhatwalia, Hamirpur vs Circle 1(1) Jalpaiguri, JalpaiguriITA 2583/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Raghava Gupta Valiveti, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer Ward 5(3)(4), BangaloreITA 2744/BANG/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026