DCIT (TDS), DEHRADUN vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, DEHRADUN

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3782/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 July 20184 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found merit in the assessee's contention, noting that a co-ordinate bench had consistently decided identical issues in favor of the assessee for previous assessment years. The CIT(A) had also followed these earlier decisions.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s decision that Section 194A of the Income-tax Act was not applicable to interest paid on a Site Restoration Fund Account. The assessee argued that a co-ordinate bench had already decided this issue in their favor for earlier assessment years.

What were the issues?

Whether interest paid on a Site Restoration Fund Account is subject to TDS under Section 194A of the Income-tax Act, considering prior co-ordinate bench decisions.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 194A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘D’ BENCH,

Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA, & SMT BEENA A. PILLAI

For Appellant: Shri Sanjiv Sapra, Adv
Hearing: 05.07.2018Pronounced: 06.07.2018

PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER,

1.

This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax(A), Dehradun dated 03.03.2015 pertaining to A.Y 2014-15.

2.

The solitary grievance of the Revenue reads as under:

“The ld. CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in holding that the provisions of section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' are not applicable on payment of interest in Site Restoration Fund Account ignoring the fact that deposits in Site Restoration Fund Account are made for a fixed period and which carry interest applicable to time deposit.”

3.

At the very outset, the ld. AR stated that the dispute has arisen because the AO did not follow the order of the co-ordinate Bench in assessee’s own case on identical issue for earlier years and the CIT(A) followed the order of the Tribunal and allowed the appeal of the assessee.

4.

The ld. DR fairly conceded to this.

5.

We have carefully considered the orders of the authorities below vis a vis the grievance raised by the Revenue in the present appeal. We find force in the contention of the ld. AR. An identical issue has been considered and decided by the coordinate bench in assessee’s own case in A.Ys 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 in to 3938/DEL/2013 and Others. We find that the coordinate bench has also decided this issue in A.Y 2013-14 in ITA No. 38/DEL/2015 in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

6.

We further find that at para 8, page 7, the first appellate authority has extracted the findings of the coordinate bench while deciding the issue in favour of the assessee. Considering the fact that the first appellate authority has allowed the appeal in favour of the assessee, placing reliance on the findings of the coordinate bench [supra] no interference is called for.

7 In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in is dismissed.

The order is pronounced in the open court on 06.07.2018.

More judgments on Section 194A

All 1,500 judgments and leading authorities on Section 194A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →