M/S J.M.TEXTILES (P) LTD,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-11(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A was not warranted as the assessee did not earn any exempt income. The addition made by the AO was directed to be deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an order related to disallowance under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer (AO) made a disallowance despite acknowledging that the assessee had no dividend income.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is permissible when the assessee has not earned any exempt income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A(SMC
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-4, Kolkata dated 23-01-2019 for the assessment year 2014-15. 2. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee Shri Sunil Surana submitted that he is not pressing the second ground of appeal preferred by the assessee, therefore, the ground no.2 of the assessee stands dismissed being not pressed.
3. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee has also brought to our notice that the ground no.1 is regarding the disallowance made by the AO applying section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”). According to Ld. Counsel, the assessee did not receive any dividend income, therefore, relying upon the decision of Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Ashika Global Securities Ltd. in ITAT 100 of 2014, GA 2122 of 2014 dated 11.06.2018 contended that no disallowance u/s. 14A was warranted in the facts of the case and, therefore, the order of the AO/Ld. CIT(A) is erroneous.
4. After hearing the rival submissions and having gone through the facts and circumstances of the case we note that the AO has acknowledged [in the assessment order at page 1] that assessee has not derived any dividend income. Despite that he applied Rule 8D read with sec. 14A to compute the disallowance u/s 14A of the Act, which he ought not to J. M. Textiles Pvt. Ltd., AY- 2014-15 have done, since the assessee did not earn any exempt income. According to me, section 14A disallowance was not warranted since the assessee did not earn any exempt income, which view has been upheld by the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Ashika Global Securities Ltd. (supra) and, therefore, we direct deletion of the addition of Rs.11,87,028/-. 5. In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed. Order is pronounced in the open court on 27th November, 2019.
Sd/- (Aby. T. Varkey) Judicial Member
Dated :27th November, 2019 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to:
Appellant – M/s. J. M. Textiles Pvt. Ltd., R. No. 301/A/4, Avanti Signature, 91A/1, Park Street, Kolkata-700 016. Respondent – ITO, Ward-11(2) , Kolkata. 2 3. CIT(A)-4, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)
CIT- , Kolkata.
DR, ITAT, Kolkata. (sent through e-mail)
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026