KAILASH JAISWAL,GORAKHPUR vs. ACIT(CC), ALLAHABAD
Facts
The assessee, Shri Kailash Jaiswal, filed appeals for Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2013-14 against appellate orders from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). During the hearing before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the assessee's representative submitted that the appeals were not being pressed.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the Departmental Representative for Revenue expressed no objection to the appeals not being pressed. Consequently, both appeals filed by the assessee were dismissed as not pressed, based on the appellant's submission.
Key Issues
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as not pressed, based on the appellant assessee's submission.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA & SHRI SUBHASH MALGURIA
PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, A.M.
(A) These appeals vide I.T.A. No.25 & 40/Alld/2023 have been filed by the assessee for assessment years 2008-09 and 2013-14 against impugned appellate orders dated 03/01/2023 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/APL/S/250/2022- 23/1048411657(1) and dated 10/03/2023 (DIN & Order No.ITBA/APL/S/ 250/2022-23/1050597618(1) of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [“CIT(A)” for short].
I.T.A. No.25 & 40/Alld/2023 Assessment Year:2008-09 & 13-14 2
(B) During the course of hearing of these appeals, the learned A.R. for the assessee submitted that these appeals are not being pressed. Learned D.R. for Revenue expressed no objection. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed, being not pressed by the appellant assessee.
(C) In the result, both the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
(Order pronounced in the open court on 30/07/2025)
Sd/. Sd/. (SUBHASH MALGURIA) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) Judicial Member Accountant Member
Dated:30/07/2025 *Singh
Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent. 3. Concerned CIT 4. D.R., I.T.A.T., Allahabad