DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. KANU KITCHEN KULTURE (P) LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal. This was based on a CBDT Circular revising the monetary limit for filing appeals before the ITAT to Rs. 20 lakhs, and directing withdrawal of pending appeals below this limit.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against the deletion of a penalty by the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The penalty was imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed based on the revised monetary limits for appeals stipulated by the CBDT Circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI ‘D’ BENCH,
PER N.K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER,
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 05.12.2014 of Commissioner of Income Tax[Appeals] - V, New Delhi pertaining to assessment year 2008-09.
The solitary grievance of the Revenue is that the ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty of Rs. 10,00,360/- imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act, 1961.
This appeal by the Revenue has to be dismissed in the light of the CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 by which the Board has revised the monetary limit for filing of appeals by the department before the ITAT and the monetary limit has been fixed at Rs. 20 lakhs. The Board at Clause 13 of the said Circular has clarified as under:
“This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals/cross objections/references to be filed henceforth in Supreme Court/High Court/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/appeals/cross objections/references. The pending appeals below the specified tax limit in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed.”
In the light of the aforesaid CBDT Circular, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
The order is pronounced in the open court on 12.07.2018.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026