ITO, WARD- 19(2), NEW DELHI vs. P MITTAL MANUFACTURING PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal. This was based on a CBDT circular revising the monetary limit for filing appeals before the ITAT to Rs. 20,00,000/-.
What were the facts?
The revenue filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order which deleted additions made by the Assessing Officer. The tax effect involved in the appeal was below Rs. 20,00,000/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the revised monetary limits prescribed by the CBDT circular.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI
Before: SH. R. K. PANDA
This appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order dated 24.08.2017 of the CIT(A)-XXV, New Delhi relating to A. Y. 2009-10.
At the time of hearing it was seen that the revenue has contested the order of the CIT (A) in deleting the addition of Rs.44,50,000/- made by the Assessing Officer u/s 68 and deleting the addition of Rs.18,100/- on account of commission. Thus, the tax effect involved in the grounds of appeal raised by the revenue is below Rs.20,00,000/-. The CBDT vide circular No.03/2018 [F.No.279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ (Pt.)] dated 11.07.2018 has revised the monetary limit to Rs.20,00,000/- for filing the appeals by the department before ITAT. As per para 3 of the said circular it is also clarified that the pending appeals of the department before ITAT having monetary limit of Rs. 20,00,000/- will be treated as withdrawn. Since in the instant case the tax effect is admittedly below Rs. 20,00,000/-, therefore, in view of the latest CBDT Circular cited (supra) the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026