ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. MS. SURBHI SEN JINDAL, NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 4710/DEL/2014Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 July 2018AY 2009-103 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal should have been withdrawn or not pressed, given the low tax effect and the CBDT circular. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection, being supportive of the Revenue's appeal, was also dismissed.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT, and the assessee filed a cross-objection. The tax effect in the Revenue's appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be dismissed in limine due to low tax effect as per CBDT circular and Section 268A of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 268A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘G’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, HON’BLE & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Goel, CA
For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT DR, Shri Kapil Goel, CA
Hearing: 19.07.2018Pronounced: 19.07.2018

Heard together (2 matters)

C.O. No. 176/Del/2017
ITA No. 4710/Del/2014

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

assessee are directed against the order passed by the Ld. CIT (Appeals)-I, New Delhi dated 3.6.2014 for A.Y. 2009-10.

2.

In , admittedly, the tax effect is below the monetary limit of Rs. 20 lakhs. In terms of CBDT CO 176/D/2017 Assessment year 2009-10 Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11th July, 2018 read with Section 268 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, this appeal by the Revenue should have been withdrawn or should not have been pressed by the Revenue. In view of the said Circular, the appeal by the Revenue is dismissed in limine.

4.

As far as the CO of the assessee is concerned, the same, being supportive to the department’s appeal, also stands dismissed.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the revenue and the cross objection of the assessee are dismissed.

Order pronounced in the Open Court on 19th July, 2018.

More judgments on Section 268A

All 3,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 268A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →