M/S AEZ INFRATECH P. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 238 of the IBC overrides the Income Tax Act, and all claims, including those of the Income Tax Department, must be entertained by the Official Liquidator. Consequently, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee have become infructuous.
What were the facts?
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the assessee under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal noted that Section 238 of the IBC has an overriding effect over other statutes, including the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, override the Income Tax Act, 1961, in cases where CIRP is initiated against an assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘B’, NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, & SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER SHAMIM YAHYA: AM The ITA Nos. 6308/DEL/2015, 6310/DEL/2015 & 6312/DEL/2015 have been filed by the Revenue against the respective orders of the Ld. CIT(A)-27, New Delhi relevant to assessment years 2006-07, 2008-09 & 2011- 1
12 respectively and ITA Nos. 6336/DEL/2015 & 6340/DEL/2015 have been filed by the assessee against the respective of the Ld. CIT(A)-27, New Delhi relevant to assessment years 2006-07 & 2011-12. 2. At the time of hearin
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 238
- DCIT221, Mumbai vs Nrc Limited, MumbaiITA 1333/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT221, Mumbai vs Nrc Limited, MumbaiITA 1332/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- DCIT221, Mumbai vs Nrc Ltd, MumbaiITA 1331/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Narayan Industries Global Limited, New Delhi vs DCIT Circle 16(1), DelhiITA 8422/DEL/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed24 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ambassador Building Solutions Pvt Ltd, Delhi vs ITO Ward 14(2), New DelhiITA 1314/DEL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026