ITO (EXEMPTIONS), NEW DELHI vs. SHRI CHATRAPATI SHIVAJI MAHARAJ MEMORIAL NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6031/DEL/2015Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 August 2018AY 2011-122 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable as per CBDT Circular No. 03/2018, which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals. The circular is binding on the revenue authorities.

What were the facts?

The Department appealed an order where the CIT(A) denied exemption under Section 11(1) and made additions to the assessee's income. The tax effect in the appeal was below Rs. 20 lakhs.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the revenue is maintainable before the Tribunal given the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the CBDT circular.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHIShri Chatrapati Shivaji

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv
For Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, Sr. DR, Shri Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv
Hearing: 26/07/2018Pronounced: 01/08/2018

O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.

1.

This appeal filed by the Department is directed against the order dated 27.08.2015 of ld CIT(A)-40 (Exemption), New Delhi for the Assessment Year 2011-12, wherein, penalty u/s the ld CIT(A) denied u/s 11(1) and made an addition of Rs. 5215158/- and Rs. 1964970/- tax demanded on the addition made, mainly on the ground that the assessee is totally involved in trade, commerce or business.

2.

At the outset of the hearing itself, the ld. DR brought to our attention that CBDT vide Circular No.03/2018 dated 11TH July 2018 has decided that the revenue would not prefer an appeal before the Tribunal if the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Therefore, he pleaded that the appeal of the revenue be decided as per the instruction of the CBDT. Ld AR also reiterated same facts.

3.

We have heard both the sides on the issue and perused the material. We find that the CBDT vide circular dated 11th July 2018 has revised the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the department before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hon’ble High Courts and Hon’ble Supreme Court. The relevant para of the aforesaid circular is reproduced as under :- ITO(Exemption) Vs Shri Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Memorial National Committee “3. Henceforth, appeals/SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder :- Sl.No. Appeals in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit(in Rs.) 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000 2. Before High Court 50,00,000 3. Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000 It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case.”

4.

We find that the tax effect involves in the appeal of the Revenue is below Rs.20 lakhs. There is no dispute that the Board’s instructions or directions issued to the Income-tax authorities are binding on those authorities, therefore, the Department should have withdrawn/not pressed the present appeal in view of the aforesaid instruction since the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than the amount of Rs.20 lakhs.

5.

In view of the above, Circular No.3/2018 dated 10.07.2018 will apply to all pending appeals. Therefore the precedent, it is held that the appeal is not maintainable in the instant case as the tax effect is less than Rs.20 lakhs. Accordingly, it is held that appeal filed by the revenue is not maintainable.

More judgments on Section 11(1)

All 245 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →