MADHAV EDUCATION TRUST,MEHSANA vs. THE DY. CIT, CIRCLE-1, EXMP, AHMEDABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
Given that the CIT(A) had already allowed the appeal against the 143(1) intimation on the denial of exemption, the assessee requested to withdraw the present appeal against the 143(3) order, stating it had become infructuous. The Revenue had no objection, and the Tribunal accordingly dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust registered u/s 12AA, claimed exemption u/s 11 and 12, but it was denied by the CPC u/s 143(1) and subsequently in scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) due to late filing of Form 10B. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal against the 143(3) order, but separately allowed the appeal against the 143(1) intimation on the same issue.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal against the assessment order u/s 143(3) denying exemption u/s 11 and 12 becomes infructuous when the CIT(A) has already allowed the appeal against the intimation order u/s 143(1) on the same issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 12AA,Section 143(1),Section 11,Section 12
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI TR SENTHIL KUMAR & SHRI NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA
PER NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] dated 09.10.2025 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19 in the proceeding u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter “the Act”).
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable trust registered u/s 12AA of the Act. The return of income for A.Y. 2018- 19 was filed on 31.08.2018 declaring total income of Rs. Nil. While processing the return u/s 143(1) of the Act, the CPC had denied the exemption claimed u/s 11 and 12 of the Act on the ground that Form No. Madhav Education Trust Vs. DCIT(E) Asst. Year:2018-19 2 10B (audit report) was not filed within the due date. Thereafter, the case of the assessee was taken up for complete scrutiny wherein the claim for deduction u/s 11 and 12 of the Act was again denied. The assessee had carried the matter in first appeal and the Ld. CIT(A) vide the impugned order had held that disallowance was made in the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act and not in the order u/s 143(3) of the Act. Further that the assessee should have challenged the intimation order and the appeal against the assessment order was dismissed by the Ld. CIT(A).
Shri Jignesh Parikh, Ld. AR of the assessee submitted that the assessee had filed Form No. 10B of the Act on 04.11.2019, well before the processing of the return of income by CPC. He explained that the assessee had subsequently filed an appeal against the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act denying the claim of deduction u/s 11 and 12 of the Act. He submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 07.01.2025 had allowed the appeal of the assessee in the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act. Therefore, the present appeal in respect of order u/s 143(3) of the Act on the same issue has become infructuous. He, therefore, sought permission to withdraw the present appeal.
The Ld. CIT-DR had no objection to withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee.
We have considered the request of the assessee. A letter dated 19.01.2026 has also been filed by the assessee explaining the facts of the case and with a request to withdraw the present appeal. Since the Madhav Education Trust Vs. DCIT(E) Asst. Year:2018-19 3 assessee doesn’t want the pursue the present appeal, the same is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Court on 28/01/2026 at Ahmedabad.
Sd/- Sd/- (TR SENTHIL KUMAR) (NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated - 28th January, 2026 Nk True Copy
आदेश आदेशक� आदेश आदेश क� क��ितिलिप क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिपअ�ेिषत �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अ�ेिषत
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026