GUJARAT URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.,GANDHINAGAR vs. THE DY.CIT, GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE, GANDHINAGAR

PDF
ITA 2157/AHD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 January 2026AY 2018-19Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member And Annapurna Gupta (Accountant Member)8 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee, Gujarat Urban Development Co.Ltd., a government-controlled nodal agency, received grants (Infrastructure Development Income - IDI) from the government for development works. While these were initially treated as fees and later as advance grants, unutilized IDI from previous years and interest earned on it were retained by the assessee instead of being spent or returned. The AO treated these amounts as income, which the CIT(A) confirmed. Additionally, a penalty was levied under Section 272A for alleged non-compliance with notices, which the assessee contested, claiming compliance via the ITD Portal.

Held

The Tribunal held that the unutilized IDI and interest earned thereon could not be treated as taxable income, as it remained an 'advance' from the government for project execution, not a subsidy or grant falling under Section 2(24)(xviii). For the penalty appeal, the Tribunal found that the assessee had indeed complied by uploading replies to the ITD Portal and deleted the penalty.

Key Issues

Whether unutilized Infrastructure Development Income (IDI) and accrued interest, treated as an 'advance' from the government, constituted taxable income. Whether penalty under Section 272A for non-compliance with notices was justified when the assessee uploaded replies to the ITD Portal.

Sections Cited

Section 250, Section 234B, Section 234C, Section 234D, Section 270A, Section 2(24)(xviii), Section 272A, Section 143(2), Section 142(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Annapurna Gupta

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate and Ms. Ukti Shah, ARs
Hearing: 21/012026Pronounced: 28/01/2026

आदेश की &ितिलिप अ'ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ( / The Appellant 2. &)थ( / The Respondent. 3. संबंिधत आयकर आयु* / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु* अपील ( ) / The CIT(A)- (NFAC), Delhi 5. िवभागीय &ितिनिध आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद/DR,ITAT, Ahmedabad. , , 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file.

आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स)ािपत &ित //True Copy// सहायक पंजीकार (Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ITAT, Ahmedabad

Date of dictation (dictation pad is attached with file) : 1. 21.1.2026 : 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the 23.1.2026 Dictating Member. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S : 3. : 4. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement. : 5. Date on which fair order placed before Other Member : 28.1.26 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S. : 28.1.26 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk. : 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk. : 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order. : 10. Date of Despatch of the Order

GUJARAT URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD.,GANDHINAGAR vs THE DY.CIT, GANDHINAGAR CIRCLE, GANDHINAGAR | BharatTax