THE MODAS NAGARIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,ARVALLI vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
For both grounds of appeal, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO). The AO was directed to verify the assessee's separate accounts/computation and the DR's contention regarding the expenses. For the bad debts provision, the AO was directed to verify the claim and allow it if the assessee is entitled under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, appealed against the CIT(A)'s confirmation of two disallowances for AY 2018-19. The first was for expenses of Rs. 53,62,300, not debited to the P&L account but deducted from reserves. The second was an addition of Rs. 27,42,118 for provision for doubtful debts, which the assessee claimed was duly made and allowable under the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether expenses not debited to the P&L account but adjusted against reserves are allowable deductions; Whether provision for doubtful debts is allowable under Section 36(1)(viia) when the assessee claims it was duly made in books of accounts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Vijaya Bank v. CIT392 citing323 ITR 166 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ C ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Annapurna Gupta
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] dated 31/07/2025 passed u/s.250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19. 2. The assessee, in this appeal, has taken
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(viia)
- M/S Malwa Gramin Bank Now Known As Punjab… vs DCIT, SangrurITA 283/CHANDI/2019[2015-16]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S the Malwa Gramin Bank, Sangrur vs ACIT, Circle, SangrurITA 1181/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S the Malwa Gramin Bank, Sangrur vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax, SangrurITA 156/CHANDI/2017[2011-12]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
- Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank, Jodhpur vs DCIT, Circle-1, JaipurITA 1248/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- State Bank of India, Mumbai vs ACIT-Circle- 2(2)(1), MumbaiITA 3429/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026