ZYDUS LIFESCIENCES LTD.,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the authorities' decision to restrict weighted deduction for R&D expenses to the extent approved by the DSIR in Form 3CL. However, the AO was directed to consider the assessee's claim for deduction under sections 35(1)(i) & 35(1)(iv) as per the DRP's directions.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, Zydus Lifesciences Ltd., appealed against the order of the DCIT concerning assessment year 2017-18. The appeal involved issues related to transfer pricing adjustments, disallowance of weighted deduction for R&D expenses, and other tax credits.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of the Transfer Pricing Officer's order beyond the time limit, the eligibility and extent of weighted deduction for R&D expenses, and the correct treatment of various tax credits and reliefs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 92CA,Section 153,Section 144C,Section 143(3),Section 35(2AB),Section 35(1)(i),Section 35(1)(iv),Section 90,Section 270A,Section 271G
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. EKL Appliances Ltd.422 citing345 ITR 241 · 2012 · HC · Read judgment
- Pharmanza Herbal (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT19 citing155 Taxmann.com 56 · 2023 · ITAT
- FDC Ltd. v. PCIT8 citing161 Taxmann.com 393 · 2024 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SMT. ANNAPURNA GUPTA & Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, AM:
The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmedabad (hereinafter referred to as “DCIT”), dated 30.03.2023 passed under Section 153C r.w.s. 144C r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act,
ITA No. 392/Ahd/2023 [Zydus Lifesciences Ltd. vs. DCIT] A.Y. 2017-18 - 2 –
1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) and relates to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 92CA
- Bellsonica Auto Component India Private… vs ACIT, Circle-1(1), GurgaonITA 1041/DEL/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Smartstream Technologies India Private… vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2220/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT-Circle 6(1)(1) Mumbai, Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7767/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- ACIT-Circle6(1)(1) Mumbai., Mumbai vs Aditya Birla Real Estate Limited, MumbaiITA 7766/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Airmeet Networks Private Limited, Bengaluru vs Assessing Officer, BengaluruITA 1487/BANG/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026