DEVKRUPA INTERNATIONAL,BHAVNAGAR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE -1 BHAVNAGAR, BHAVNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as it was based on "borrowed satisfaction" and mechanical application without independent verification or tangible material by the Assessing Officer. The reasons recorded were found to be contrary to the facts (that amounts were loan repayments), making the reassessment void ab initio. Consequently, the addition made u/s 68 was deemed not to survive.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Devkrupa International, a partnership firm, filed its ITR for A.Y. 2017-18. Assessment was reopened u/s 148 based on Insight Portal information alleging accommodation entries of Rs. 71,42,500 from M/s. Kasturi Commodities Pvt. Ltd., leading to an addition u/s 68. The assessee contended these were short-term loans repaid with interest, supported by documentary evidence, and that the reopening lacked independent application of mind.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid given the lack of independent application of mind and tangible material by the Assessing Officer. 2. Whether the addition of Rs. 71,42,500/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 was justified when the assessee claimed it as repayment of short-term loans.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(1),Section 148,Section 68,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 151,Section 143(3),Section 2(40)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sabh Infrastructure Ltd. v. ACIT137 citing398 ITR 198 · 2017 · HC
- 1. Harikishan S. Virmani v. DCIT97 citing394 ITR 146 · 2017 · HC
- 1. Paresh Babubhai Bhalani v. ITO57 citing136 Taxmann.com 139 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
आदेश की �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026