SHREE SAURASTRA GURJAR SUTAR VISHVAKARMA PARIVAR,AHMEDABAD vs. CIT(E), AHMEDABADA, AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(E)'s decision, stating that the application for final registration was correctly dismissed due to the absence of prior provisional registration. As the assessee had already secured provisional registration post-rejection, the Tribunal found no merit in the present appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for final registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was rejected by the CIT(E) because the assessee had never obtained provisional registration. The appeal challenging this rejection was also time-barred by 48 days, for which the stated reasons were deemed insufficient. Subsequently, the assessee successfully obtained provisional registration.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the assessee's application for final registration under Section 12A due to the absence of prior provisional registration, and if the delay in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Annapurna Gupta
Assessee by : Shri Parth Mistry, AR Revenue by : Shri V.K. Singh, CIT-DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 19/02/2026 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 25/02/2026 आदेश/O R D E R
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] dated 29/08/2025.
The assessee, in this appeal, is aggrieved against the action of the Ld. CIT(E) in rejecting the application of the assessee for registration u/s.12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). Shree Saurastra Gurjar Sutar Vishvakarma Parivar vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : 2026-27
The appeal is time-barred by 48 days. A separate application for condonation of delay has been filed, wherein, it has been pleaded that the assessee had applied for final registration under sub-clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of Section 12A of the Act, by filing the application in Form 10AB of the Act on 24/02/2025. It has also been pleaded that thereafter, the Ld. CIT(E) called for necessary details from the assessee-trust. However, the Ld. CIT(E) after going through the said details, dismissed the application of the assessee. It has been further pleaded that the Consultant of the assessee was extremely busy with statutory compliances relating to Tax Audit Reports and Income Tax Returns during the peak filing season and could not file the present appeal in time. The reason for condonation of delay does not constitute sufficient reasons for the purpose of condoning the delay in filing the application.
The fact on the file is that the assessee was not enjoying any original registration, entitling the assessee to file the application for final/regular registration. The Ld. CIT(E) noted that since the assessee was never granted the provisional registration, therefore, there was no question for granting the final/regular registration. He, accordingly, rightly dismissed the application of the assessee for final registration.
We have been further apprised that after dismissal of the application of the assessee vide impugned order of the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee again applied for provisional registration to the Ld. CIT(E) which has already been granted to the assessee vide order dated 10/02/2026 applicable from AYs 2026-27 to 2029-30. The assessee fully aware of the fact that the assessee’s application for final registration was rightly dismissed by the Ld. CIT(E), applied afresh for provisional registration, which has been duly granted to Shree Saurastra Gurjar Sutar Vishvakarma Parivar vs. CIT(E) Asst. Year : 2026-27 the assessee. Therefore, no case is made out in the present appeal of the assessee and the same is, accordingly, dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Atiquiddin Shaikh vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Mr. Gurudev Singh vs. Kotak Mahindra BankMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026