CEVA FREIGHT LLC,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (IT) CIRCLE-1(2)(1) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee wished to withdraw its appeal, and the Revenue had no objection. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order for AY 2017-18. The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and filed a declaration.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “D”: NEW DELHI
ORDER PERSUDHIR KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The assessee preferred the captioned appeal, challenging the order dated 19.01.2021 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Coimbatore(“Ld. CIT(A) for short”)pertaining to ITA 249/Del/2021 A.Y. 2017-18 Ceva Fright LLCvs. DCIT(IT) Circle -1 (2) (1) assessment order for Assessment year 2017-18 and arises out of the assessment order dated 06.02.2020 passed under Sections 143(3)r.w.s. 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act for short”).
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted before the Bench that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,2024 and duly filed declaration in Form No. 1 with the Department Acknowledgment No.925833400030425, dated 03.04.2025. The said Form No. 1 placed on record by the assessee. It was submitted that although the assessee has not been issued Form No. 2by thedepartment, but it is assessee’s appeal; and the assessee wants to withdraw its appeal. The assessee may be allowed to withdraw its appeal. The Ld. CIT-DR submitted that the Department has no objection if the appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn as it is the assessee’s appeal and the assessee want to withdraw its appeal. 3 . After hearing both the parties and perusing the material on record, we hereby dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee being withdrawn by the assessee. Since it is the assessee’s appeal and the assessee is itself praying for its dismissalbeing withdrawn, we dismiss this appeal as ITA 249/Del/2021 A.Y. 2017-18 Ceva Fright LLCvs. DCIT(IT) Circle -1 (2) (1) being withdrawn by the assessee. In case, if the aforesaid matter is not finally settled /approved under the scheme, the liberty is granted to the assessee to file application for restoration of its appeal. 4. With the above, mentioned liberty given to the assessee the appeal filed is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 08/04/2025.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026